Showing posts with label Pride and Prejudice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pride and Prejudice. Show all posts

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Old-Fashioned Charm Review: Death Comes To Pemberley (2013 Miniseries)

 Here is a delightfully insightful and informative review of the recent adaptation of P.D. James's Death Comes to Pemberley by Miss Laurie of the Old-Fashioned Charm blog.



If you haven't seen the miniseries, but have been thinking about it, I would highly recommend this review! There are plenty of lovely photos, and the writing is well-organized under headings such as costumes, scenery, questionable scenes and historical accuracy.


My opinion of the 2013 miniseries coincides with Miss Laurie's, so I would also recommend watching it (after reading the review, of course)!

 
The BBC One Trailer


Monday, November 15, 2010

'Pride and Prejudice' Preview from Ross Valley Players

________________________________


The Ross Valley Players have posted a video preview of their upcoming production of 'Pride & Prejudice' which has made me quite excited about going to see a performance! The costumes look very well done -- especially Mr. Darcy's, which makes him look quite the Regency gentleman.



Saturday, October 23, 2010

'Pride and Prejudice' Play

____________________________

The Ross Valley Players Present
Pride and Prejudice!






You've read the book and its sequels and retellings, seen all the movies and own the soundtracks -- what's next? May I suggest the play! The Ross Valley Players, possibly the oldest community theater group this side of the Rocky Mountains, having performed for eighty years, is including "Pride and Prejudice" in their production line-up this season, from November 11 to December 12.

The play was written in 2006 by playwright Jon Jory and has been described as comprehensive, yet fast-moving, just the way Jane wrote P and P:

"All of the wit and romance of Austen's classic 1813 novel come to
life in this refreshingly fast-paced and engaging new adaptation.
The San Francisco Chronicle said that Jory has crafted an
exceptionally clear, funny and moving version. The Tucson
Weekly
said that Jory gets the entire story told without either
cramming the script with detail or omitting anything crucial."

Tickets are available online from Brown Paper Tickets and from the RVP website.

The theater is located in Ross, California, just north of San Francisco near San Rafael. 

So for anyone living near the bay area or who is planning to be nearby, this would be a special way to experience more of Jane Austen and her beloved Pride and Prejudice!
__________________________________

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Sacramento's JA Book Club: Week 4

______________________________________________

Pride & Prejudice


[I'm a little behind with my posting -- my apologies! But hopefully I'm back on track, now.]


And now to the completion of our P&P study at the book club: We resumed our discussion using the questions previously handed out, which proved to be immensely interesting and insightful. Circles of chairs were scattered about the hall, almost completely filling it, and discussion filled the air! With the echo it was sometimes difficult to hear what the ladies in my group were saying, especially across the circle. We arrived a little late, so I came in to find myself apparently in the middle of a  discussion of this question: "To whom would you least wish to be related -- Elizabeth's mother or Darcy's aunt?"

    "To whom would you least wish to be related -- Elizabeth's mother or Darcy's aunt?"
The P&P Postcard, by Sue Harrison

As light-hearted as this question might appear, some very important observations arose from it. One is that Mrs. Bennet and Lady Catherine alike in that they are extremely intent on getting their daughters married to particular young men. I'd never really thought about that before! Now anyone who's read P&P knows that Mrs. Bennet employs all her powers to get Mr. Bingley married to Jane. Yet the earnestness of Lady Catherine is hardly less, when you consider she traveled all the way to Longbourn to make Lizzy promise not to marry Mr. Darcy because, as Lady Catherine angrily points out, "he is engaged to my daughter." Someone observed that Lady Catherine is herself quite un-intentionally instrumental in bringing Lizzy and Mr. Darcy together. For example, while they are both staying in Kent Lady Catherine invites Lizzy to Rosings often and Mr. Darcy has ample opportunities to meet her walking in the surrounding countryside. These meetings reach their climax with the disastrous first proposal and the ensuing letter which turns out to be the catalyst for both Lizzy and Mr. Darcy to begin seeing themselves as they really are and thus to their being finally drawn together. Of course we all remember the effect on Mr. Darcy of Lady Catherine's visit to Lizzy '"It allowed me to hope,' said he, 'as I had scarcely ever allowed myself to hope before.'"




    '"It allowed me to hope," said he, "as I had scarcely ever allowed myself to hope before."'


 Another insightful part of the conversation stemmed from this question: "In their conversation after his proposal, Elizabeth makes two accusations against Darcy, one concerning Wickham and one concerning Jane. In his subsequent letter how does Darcy defend himself against each of these accusations?"
 
The P&P Postcard, by Sue Harrison
Someone made the point that Lizzy is able to see more clearly, from reading Mr. Darcy's uncomplimentary description, how socially deficient her family really is. She'd always thought their behavior to be mortifying, but to think something to oneself is one thing; to hear it from an outside observer is quite another altogether! This realization cannot help but make small inroads toward softening Lizzy's opinion of Mr. Darcy's character. His observation of Jane's behavior, though partial, helps Lizzy to see how Jane is seen by other people, that her reserved nature does not convey an appearance of strong feeling to outside observers. This insight also aids in softening her opinion towards Mr. Darcy. Someone pointed out that Mr Darcy has a personality very similar to Jane's, another thought that had never occurred to me! Just as Jane's reserved is misread, so is Mr. Darcy's -- only instead of being seen as having a lack of strong feelings, as in Jane's case, he is seen as an uncaring and haughty man.


A discussion of Charlotte's and Lizzy's views on marriage then took center stage in our circle. How aware was Charlotte of what she was getting into? We all seemed to decide that she was quite aware, and had planned to find contentment in keeping a good household rather than in having a husband who is equal in mind and goals. "But were they really so incompatible, with not a single goal in unison?" someone wondered. (For, we all agreed, a common goal is indispensable to a successful marriage). Their marriage would not  necessarily be labeled an unsuccessful one; they don't seem to have argued or even complained. Their goal seems to have been to have a suitable marriage, as far as society's standards went, in regards to income, property, comfortable provision and producing an heir. Voila! With all those things present, we can just pronounce their marriage to be successful, and move on... Or can we?

The P&P Postcard, by Sue Harrison

While looking at Lizzy and Mr. Darcy, I believe some criteria should be added to what constitutes a successful marriage. Lizzy was looking for something more than Charlotte: a man who could meet and help provide for her needs on deeper levels, such as emotionally and in rational conversation. And of course she wanted romance! We all know that Mr. Collins falls short in all these categories. Jane Austen tells us that Lizzy and Mr. Darcy bring elements into their marriage that will add to it and improve each other.

"It was a union which must have been to the advantage of both; by her ease and liveliness, his mind might have been softened, his manners improved; and from his judgement, information and knowledge of the world, she must have received benefit of greater importance."
The P&P Postcard, by Sue Harrison

There could not be a much happier ending to a book or discussion than that!
The discussion time having ended, the entire room then cleared their chairs away, making ample space down the gallery for a short and comprehensive lesson to us all on English Country dancing! This was provided by a group connected with the Sacramento Country Dance Society (or SCDS). After a demonstration, they called everyone on to the floor to join in. What great fun! There were smiles and laughter everywhere as we all tried to remember what we were supposed to do. I've never seen such long lines of dancers! Except for the missing period clothes and the sideboard with a bowl of punch, the long gallery with it's balcony above and live music below, almost transported me back to Regency England!

A view of the dancers from the balcony

A view of the balcony from the floor below
_______________________________________

The next meeting will be on September 12 and will focus on Mansfield Park. It will consist of an introduction by Dr. Bell, and a discussion of volume I. (Get a copy of Dr. Bell's discussion questions here.)

In the next book club post: Emma! (My favorite!) 
_________________________________________________

Monday, July 12, 2010

Sacramento's JA Book Club: Week 3

_______________________________

Pride & Prejudice

Our look into Jane's story of the Bennets, Bingleys, Darcys, Collinses, Lucases and De Bourghs began with a tour of sites important in her life and in her novels through photographs taken by Rachel Dodge from her tour with JASNA. Once again, I wish I lived in England!



The photos included:

(from Jane's own life)
  • The site where Steventon Rectory formerly stood
  • Steventon St. Nicholas church where Mr. Austen preached
  • Wheatsheaf Inn where they came to collect their post
  • Ashe House, home of the Lefroys
  • Deane House
  • Ibthorpe, which has been well-preserved and hardly changed, home of their friends the Lloyds
  • No. 4 Sydney Place, Bath, the Austens' first residence in the city
  • Castle Square in Southampton
  • Chawton Cottage, of course
  • Goodnestone Park in Kent, home of her brother Edward's mother-in-law Mrs. Knight
  • Godmersham Park in Kent, Edward's home, now a place for businesses and a conference room!
  • Winchester and its cathedral





(from Jane's novels)
  • The Pump Room in Bath, Northanger Abbey and Persuasion
  • The magnificent Upper Rooms in Bath, Northanger Abbey
  • Box Hill, Emma
  • Lyme Regis, Persuasion
  • Portsmouth, Mansfield Park
  • Derbyshire: Matlock Bridge, Dovedale, Bolsover Castle (not from the JASNA tour; different source), Pride and Prejudice

The pictures were all enticing, especially for anyone who wants to travel to England, and along with a cheerful and personal commentary by Rachel Dodge, with not too many facts crammed in about each location (which was nice for me, having read them all a hundred times before), which made a lovely presentation. (The projector screen made some pictures just a bit dark at times, sadly.) My favorites were of the Steventon Rectory's former site, so lushly green and peaceful, and the homes and gardens of Kent, since I've never been to either. Next time... Derbyshire, with it's mountains, mist and greenery, looks like a place
filled with natural beauty! She read a couple quotes from P&P during the Derbyshire pictures -- loved it!

"Edward Ferrars: only £ 100 per year, poor boy"

There was no book discussion this week, but we received a fascinating lecture entitled "How Much are They Worth? The Characters in
Sense & Sensibility and Pride & Prejudice," by Dr. Bell, which included a description of the entail process (that was especially interesting -- and a bit confusing). He reminded us that a character's fortune (or lack of) is not just about numbers, that we can discover reasons for actions and see the moral fiber of many through their monetary circumstances' effect on them. Willoughby and Wickham are obvious examples of a bad effect, with their search for wealthy wives. We learned how to calculate the annual income of a lady's fortune -- quite enlightening for me -- which, if we use Jane's usual figure of 5% interest, means dividing the whole of the fortune by 20. So Miss Bingley's £ 20,000 would give her an annual income of £ 1,000. How gentlemen earned their thousands a year was another enlightening point to me. I've never been totally sure where exactly their money came from! Although I had my guesses. So to boil it down, their money came from tenants on their land and the sale of supplies (such as crops, livestock and timber) that came from their land. Voila! To find a gentleman's net worth, one does just the opposite of the lady's and multiplies it by 20. So Mr. Darcy with £ 10,000 a year has a net worth of £ 200,000 -- wow. Of course we're all wondering what the modern equivalent is! But Dr. Bell said that's very difficult to do accurately, with the change of what people buy and the value of money. And I understand that. Still, it would be interesting to at least have a guess.


Now, the entail... I won't attempt to explain all that! Only give the gist of it. Sacramento Library will be putting the audio of the lecture online, so if you want all the details, visit How Austentatious! Two important points: 1) Judges insisted property could not be divided without its' owners consent, and 2) To keep the power of the landed gentry, the estates should be passed on in tact. This all resulted in the pivotal point of "The Strict Settlement" (T.S.S. from now on), all the information on entails comes from that act, so remember it! This part of the lecture answered some long-nagging questions I've had, once I could wrap my head around it all. And I have to say that Dr. Bell did an excellent job of explaining this messy subject! T.S.S. basically laid out what was to be done with the estate on the death of it's current owner, and was drawn up and had to be agreed upon by him and his eldest son. When the son came of age or was married the estate and all its income was passed to him, but he could not do anything with it, like selling parts of it; it had to remain whole. He could decline making T.S.S. and be in total control of the estate to do what he wished with, but only after his father's death, plus he would get no income from it until that time, which could be many years away! So eldest sons usually chose T.S.S. option. Jointures for wives, provisions for younger sons and portions for daughters were written into T.S.S. as well.

So, we wonder, why couldn't Mr. Bennet pass his estate to a daughter instead of Mr. Collins? The De Bourghs' did it, didn't they? It all goes back to T.S.S.! If the passing on of the estate to the female line in the event of no sons was not written into T.S.S., there was nothing to be done about it. Sir Lewis De Bourgh and his father apparently thought of that event, but not Mr. Bennet and his father, much to the trying of the nerves of Mrs. Bennet. So instead, T.S.S. stated that the estate be entailed to the nearest male relation. And Mr. Bennet couldn't make a re-settlement of previous T.S.S. because Mr. Collins is not his son. I hope this makes some sense! Again, listen to the lecture, when they get it up on the website -- it was extremely interesting if you've at all wondered about these things!


This concludes my recap of the third week's events.

Next week, the 25th: a discussion of
P&P, and a dancing lesson!!

_______________________________________

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

An Apology and Reminder

_________________________________

I have been abominably derelict in my blogging duties -- please forgive me, dear readers! There is a post coming soon!

And a reminder to all in the Sacramento area: The Jane Austen book club is meeting this Sunday, July 11 at the Central Library from 2:00-4:00, and this month's book...? Pride & Prejudice! With a virtual tour by Rachel Dodge of all the locales and architecture in Jane's novels. Don't miss it! It is a rewarding experience -- for free! (Parking, too!)















Oh, how Austentatious!
__________________________________